Purpose:

Deliver measurable business value, tangible and intangible, while aligning and improving the business and IT strategy.

Objective:

Building the IT portfolio should result in:

    • Institutionalized management processes that are defined, documented, and easily accessible for creating, assessing, and balancing the portfolio. These processes can be repeated and are consistent
    • Regularly validating costs, benefits, and risk data to support IT investment decisions. The information and data are accurate, reliable, and up-to-date, forming the basis for grounded decision-making
    • Focusing on continuously measuring and evaluating progress and results
      • Assess the effectiveness of the IT portfolio management process
      • Determine the impact on performance
      • Evaluate the efficiency of the generation of relevant data and decision-making processes
      • Assess the completeness of how faithfully the processes, stages, and activities are being followed across the company and how often investments are being revisited

Description:

In the information age, knowledge provides a competitive edge that no business can ignore. The challenge, however, is that with all of the hype, complexity, and confusion around information technology (not to mention a healthy dose of jargon), it is often difficult to distinguish between good and bad technology investments. That’s problematic, or at least it should be, because information technology is the central nervous system of most organizations, providing the tools to act rapidly to changes in the business environment. If the information technology is optimized, the organization can thrive, even in the most chaotic times. Optimizing information technology investments is not an option – it is a business mandate.

Information technology investments currently account for the majority of capital expenditures within many organizations; therefore, it must be treated with at least the same due diligence rigor as any other capital investment. A sound business case must exist; it must support the strategy of the organization, and it must support and, in many ways, adhere to new legislation.

We are increasingly expected to provide accurate information to multiple shareholder and stakeholder groups at light speed. But that should not be a justification for throwing caution to the wind and spending whatever it takes to accomplish that goal. Like any other investment, information technology must be actively managed throughout its entire life cycle, ensuring that both its initial and ongoing costs do not exceed the benefits it provides. We cannot afford to treat investments in information technology as unmanaged operating expenses, as they provide far too many opportunities for value creation, cost savings, and relevant, timely, and accurate information that serve as critical elements of competitive advantage.

Portfolio management provides a sound and proven business approach to optimizing investments in information technology. The investment portfolio metaphor offers a mechanism to govern investments in information technology that accounts for their value, risks, costs, useful life, and interrelationships. Much the way an investment manager dynamically manages a portfolio of financial investments, business leaders must make an intelligent buy, sell, and hold decisions around their investments in information technology to optimize revenue and growth opportunities, improve customer experience, and streamline operations; when appropriately done, the productivity improvements and cost savings that result will positively impact the bottom line and allow us to fulfill our primary obligation: driving shareholder value.  For example, automated transaction processing through online order-making and order taking has created opportunities to offer complex services through dynamically packaging new customized offerings, generating additional fees, and better meeting the customer needs of a global audience. The online travel business is a good example of how information technology has served as a powerful enabler, facilitating streamlined fee-for-service and inventory management models, and providing greater access to published air, car, cruise, and hotel fares, and travel packages worldwide for both leisure and business travelers.

With the growing investment in information technology and the profound contribution of information technology within many organizations, it is imperative that the interactions between risk, reward, and value for information technology investments are proactively identified, evaluated, prioritized, and managed. Portfolio Management makes this case firmly and logically, providing evidence and case studies to support this argument. Portfolio Management highlights the impact of adopting this technique, from organizational change to governance impacts down to the bottom line. Many books present approaches to effecting positive business change. Still, Portfolio Management presents the approach and provides the steps required to transform an organization from ad hoc information technology management to information technology optimization, replete with lessons learned. Portfolio Management is not a revolutionary approach. It is an evolutionary approach that works. Online-PMO thoughtfully provides tools to measure your organization’s abilities and to help it evolve to information technology excellence.

Organizations can evolve into adaptive real-time enterprises that thrive in a world of change. Portfolio Management provides an answer to every senior business leader’s questions around the black hole of the IT budget. Portfolio Management also offers solutions to how IT professionals should breakdown the barriers and effectively communicate with business leaders in their language. Maintaining a strong balance sheet, alignment of assets, occupying and sustaining a leadership position, and achieving a profitable and relevant return on investments cannot be separated from sound practices of portfolio management, and are the fiduciary responsibilities of leaders in an information technology era.

Entrance Criteria:

  • Enterprise Strategic Intent
  • Enterprise Business Objectives
  • Business Unit Objectives/Requirements
  • IT Plan (IT Policies, Principles, Roadmap, etc.)

Exit Criteria:

  • IT Balanced Scorecard

Process and Procedures:

Tailoring Guidelines:

  • None

Process Verification Record(s):

  • <?>
    • Stored By: <?>

Measure(s):

  • Enterprise Financial Balanced Scorecard
    • Stakeholder value of business investments
      • Percent of investments where value delivered meets stakeholder expectations
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Percent of products and services where expected benefits are realized
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Percent of investments where claimed benefits are met or exceeded
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
    • Portfolio of competitive products and services
      • Percent of products and services that meet or exceed targets in revenues and/or market share
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Ratio of products and services per life cycle phase
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Percent of products and services that meet or exceed customer satisfaction targets
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Percent of products and services that provide competitive advantage
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
    • Managed business risk (safeguarding of assets)
      • Percent of critical business objectives and services covered by risk assessment
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Ratio of significant incidents that were not identified in risk assessments vs. total incidents
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Frequency of update of risk profile
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
    • Compliance with external laws and regulations
      • Cost of regulatory non-compliance, including settlements and fines
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Number of regulatory non-compliance issues causing public comment or negative publicity
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Number of regulatory non-compliance issues relating to contractual agreements with business partners
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
    • Financial transparency
      • Percent of investment business cases with clearly defined and approved expected costs and benefits
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Percent of products and services with defined and approved operational costs and expected benefits
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Satisfaction survey of key stakeholders regarding the transparency, understanding and accuracy of enterprise financial information
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Percent of service cost that can be allocated to users
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
  • Enterprise Customer Balanced Scorecard
    • Customer-oriented service culture
      • Number of customer service disruptions due to IT service-related incidents (reliability)
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Percent of business stakeholders satisfied that customer service delivery meets agreed-on levels
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Number of customer complaints
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • The trend of customer satisfaction survey results
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
    • Business service continuity and availability
      • Number of customer service interruptions causing significant incidents
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Business cost of incidents
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Number of business processing hours lost due to unplanned service interruptions
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Percent of complaints as a function of committed service availability targets
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
    • Agile responses to a changing business environment
      • Level of board satisfaction with enterprise responsiveness to new requirements
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Number of critical products and services supported by up-to-date business processes
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Average time to turn strategic enterprise objectives into an agreed-on and approved initiative
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
    • Information-based strategic decision making
      • Degree of board and executive management satisfaction with decision making
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Number of incidents caused by incorrect business decisions based on inaccurate information
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Time to provide supporting information to enable effective business decision
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
    • Optimization of service delivery costs
      • Frequency of service delivery cost optimization assessments
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Trend of cost assessment vs. service level results
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Satisfaction levels of board and executive management with service delivery costs
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
  • Enterprise Internal Balanced Scorecard
    • Optimization of business process functionality
      • Frequency of business process capability maturity assessments
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Trend of assessment results
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Satisfaction levels of board and executives with business process capabilities
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
    • Optimization of business process costs
      • Frequency of business process cost optimization assessments
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Trend of cost assessment vs. service level results
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Satisfaction levels of board and executive management with business processing costs
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
    • Managed business change programs
      • Number of programs on time and within budget
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Percent of stakeholders satisfied with program delivery
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Level of awareness of business change induced by IT-enabled business initiatives
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
    • Operational and staff productivity
      • Number of programs/projects on time and within budget
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Cost and staffing levels compared to benchmarks
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
    • Compliance with internal policies
      • Number of incidents related to non-compliance to policy
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Percent of stakeholders who understand policies
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Percent of policies supported by effective standards and working practices
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
  • Enterprise Learning and Growth Balanced Scorecard
    • Skilled and motivated people
      • Level of stakeholder satisfaction with staff expertise and skills
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Percent of staff whose skills are insufficient for the competency required for their role
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Percent of satisfied staff
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
    • Product and business innovation culture
      • Level of awareness and understanding of business innovation opportunities
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Stakeholder satisfaction with levels of product and innovation expertise and ideas
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Number of approved product and service initiatives resulting from innovative ideas
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
  • IT Financial Balanced Scorecard
    • Alignment of IT and business strategy
      • Percent of enterprise strategic goals and requirements supported by IT strategic goals
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Level of stakeholder satisfaction with scope of the planned portfolio of programs and services
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Percent of IT value drivers mapped to business value drivers
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
    • IT compliance and support for business compliance with external laws and regulations
      • Cost of IT non-compliance, including settlements and fines, and the impact of reputational loss
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Number of IT-related non-compliance issues reported to the board or causing public comment or embarrassment
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Number of non-compliance issues relating to contractual agreements with IT service providers
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Coverage of compliance assessments
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
    • Commitment of executive management for making IT-related decisions
      • Percent of executive management roles with clearly defined accountabilities for IT decisions
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Number of times IT is on the board agenda in a proactive manner
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Frequency of IT strategy (executive) committee meetings
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Rate of execution of executive IT-related decisions
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
    • Managed IT-related business risk
      • Percent of critical business processes, IT services and IT-enabled business programs covered by risk assessment
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Number of significant IT-related incidents that were not identified in risk assessment
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Percent of enterprise risk assessments including IT-related risk
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Frequency of update of risk profile
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
    • Realized benefits from IT-enabled investments and services portfolio
      • Percent of IT-enabled investments where benefit realization is monitored through the full economic life cycle
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Percent of IT services where expected benefits are realized
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Percent of IT-enabled investments where claimed benefits are met or exceeded
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
    • Transparency of IT costs, benefits and risk
      • Percent of investment business cases with clearly defined and approved expected IT-related costs and benefits
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Percent of IT services with clearly defined and approved operational costs and expected benefits
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Satisfaction survey of key stakeholders regarding the level of transparency, understanding and accuracy of IT financial information
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
  • IT Customer Balanced Scorecard
    • Delivery of IT services in line with business requirements
      • Number of business disruptions due to IT service incidents
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Percent of business stakeholders satisfied that IT service delivery meets agreed-on service levels
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Percent of users satisfied with the quality of IT service delivery
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
    • Adequate use of applications, information and technology solutions
      • Percent of business process owners satisfied with supporting IT products and services
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Level of business user understanding of how technology solutions support their processes
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Satisfaction level of business users with training and user manuals
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Net present value (NPV) showing business satisfaction level of the quality and usefulness of the technology solutions Internal
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
  • IT Customer Balanced Scorecard
    • IT agility
      • Level of satisfaction of business executives with IT’s responsiveness to new requirements
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Number of critical business processes supported by up-to-date infrastructure and applications
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Average time to turn strategic IT objectives into an agreed-on and approved initiative
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
    • Security of information, processing infrastructure and applications
      • Number of security incidents causing financial loss, business disruption or public embarrassment
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Number of IT services with outstanding security requirements
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Time to grant, change and remove access privileges, compared to agreed-on service levels
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Frequency of security assessment against latest standards and guidelines
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
    • Optimization of IT assets, resources and capabilities
      • Frequency of capability maturity and cost optimization assessments
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Trend of assessment results
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Satisfaction levels of business and IT executives with IT-related costs and capabilities
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
    • Enablement and support of business processes by integrating applications and technology into business processes
      • Number of business processing incidents caused by technology integration errors
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Number of business process changes that need to be delayed or reworked because of technology integration issues
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Number of IT-enabled business programmes delayed or incurring additional cost due to technology integration issues
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Number of applications or critical infrastructures operating in silos and not integrated
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
    • Delivery of programs delivering benefits, on time, on budget, and meeting requirements and quality standards
      • Number of programs/projects on time and within budget
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Percent of stakeholders satisfied with program/project quality
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Number of programs needing significant rework due to quality defects
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Cost of application maintenance vs. overall IT cost
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
    • Availability of reliable and useful information for decision making
      • Level of business user satisfaction with quality and timeliness (or availability) of management information
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Number of business process incidents caused by non-availability of information
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Ratio and extent of erroneous business decisions where erroneous or unavailable information was a key factor
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
    • IT compliance with internal policies
      • Number of incidents related to non-compliance to policy
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Percent of stakeholders who understand policies
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Percent of policies supported by effective standards and working practices
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Frequency of policies review and update
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
  • IT Learning and Growth Balanced Scorecard
    • Competent and motivated business and IT personnel
      • Percent of staff whose IT-related skills are sufficient for the competency required for their role
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Percent of staff satisfied with their IT-related roles
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Number of learning/training hours per staff member
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
    • Knowledge, expertise and initiatives for business innovation
      • Level of business executive awareness and understanding of IT innovation possibilities
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Level of stakeholder satisfaction with levels of IT innovation expertise and ideas
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>
      • Number of approved initiatives resulting from innovative IT ideas
        • Maintained By: <?>
        • Submitted By: <?>
        • Frequency of Submission: <?>

References:

  • <?>